I did a lit­tle (very lit­tle) more work on rst2pdf [1]

Bet­ter:

• Head­­ers

• Foot­ers

• Foot­notes (as end­notes, re­al foot­notes are too much work be­­cause you have to re­flow the tex­t)

• Ex­ter­­nal links (http, email)

• Some styling im­prove­­ments (mean­ing: the out­­put is not so painful in the eye­­s)

• Pa­per size sup­­port

• Re­al sep­a­ra­­tors

Then there are some things you just get be­cause it's done us­ing re­port­lab:

• True­­Type font em­bed­d­ing (check the ex­am­­ple be­low, and look at the monospaced font)

• No hy­phen­a­tion (although there is a project on the web that claims to have done it, I should check it out)

Still bro­ken:

• No way to put things like page num­bers or sec­­tion names in head­­er­s/­­foot­ers

• The foot­notes are not linked to their con­­tents and vicev­er­sa

• In fac­t, no in­­ter­­nal links work, in­­­clud­ing ti­­tle re­f­er­ences

• Ta­bles are pret­­ty bro­ken

And here is the usu­al ver­sion of the rst de­mo show­ing im­prove­ments.